IMPACT OF PERSONALIZED LEARNING ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Main Article Content

Hajam Aajaz Ahmed
Tursunqulov Inom Abdukhalilovich
Shukurov Rustam Ergash ugli

Abstract

This research paper investigates the impact of personalized learning on student engagement and academic performance across diverse educational contexts. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of student performance data with qualitative insights from educators and students. Data collection includes pre- and post-intervention assessments, surveys, interviews, and classroom observations to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effects of personalized learning strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hajam, A., Tursunqulov, I., & Shukurov, R. (2024). IMPACT OF PERSONALIZED LEARNING ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS. Konferensiyalar, 1(1), 326-330. https://doi.org/10.5281/

References

Afini Normadhi, N. B., Shuib, L., Md Nasir, H. N., Bimba, A., Idris, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2019). Identification of personal traits in adaptive learning environment: Systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 130, 168–190. Doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.005.

Aka, E. I. (2020). Investigating the change in career decision making selfefficacy levels of university students. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 310–326.

Lin, C. F., Yeh, Y. C., Hung, Y. H., & Chang, R. I. (2013). Data mining for providing a personalized learning path in creativity: An application of decision trees. Computers & Education, 68, 199–210. Doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2013.05.009. 330

Schmid, R., & Petko, D. (2019). Does the use of educational technology in personalized learning environments correlate with self-reported digital skills and beliefs of secondary-school students? Computers & Education, 136, 75–86. Doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.006.

Moos, D. C., & Bonde, C. (2016). Flipping the classroom: Embedding selfregulated learning prompts in videos. Technology. Knowledge and Learning, 21(2), 225–242. Doi:10.1007/s10758-015-9269-1.

Scheiter, K., Schubert, C., Schüler, A., Schmidt, H., Zimmermann, G., Wassermann, B., Krebs, M.-C., & Eder, T. (2019). Adaptive multimedia: Using gazecontingent instructional guidance to provide personalized processing support. Computers & Education, 139, 31–47. Doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.005.

Lee, D., Huh, Y., Lin, C. Y., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2018). Technology functions for personalized learning in learner-centered schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1269–1302. Doi:10.1007/ s11423018-9615-9.

Park, S., & Jun, H. (2017). Relationships between motivational strategies and cognitive learning in distance education courses. Distance Education, 38(3), 302–320. Doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1369007.

Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N., & Niakan Kalhori, R.,, S., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., & Ghazi Saeedi, M. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 142–163. Doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1558257.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.