CRITICAL READING SKILLS THROUGH MODERN ENGLISH LITERATURE

Main Article Content

Raxmatullayeva Yulduz Nurulla qizi

Abstract

Critical reading is an essential component of advanced language competence because it requires readers not only to understand what a text says but also to examine how meaning is constructed, whose perspective is represented, what assumptions underlie the text, and how linguistic choices influence interpretation. Modern English literature provides particularly valuable material for the development of such skills because literary texts frequently combine complex language, multiple perspectives, ambiguity, symbolism, social issues, cultural references, and implicit meanings. This article examines the potential of modern English literature for developing critical reading skills in English-language and English-as-a-foreignlanguage contexts. The study is based on a qualitative synthesis of established research on literary reading, critical literacy, stylistics, critical thinking, and literaturebased language education. Particular attention is given to reader response, contextual interpretation, linguistic analysis, evaluation of evidence, recognition of ideology and perspective, and comparative interpretation. Existing empirical evidence demonstrates that explicit instruction in critical thinking and critical reading can produce measurable educational effects. A meta-analysis of 117 studies involving 20,698 participants reported an overall mean effect size of 0.34 for instructional interventions targeting critical thinking, while a more recent university-level study involving 39 undergraduate students found that 94.87% of participants considered a two-stage critical reading model helpful. The analysis indicates that modern English literature is most effective for critical reading development when literary interpretation is combined with explicit questioning, contextualization, stylistic analysis, discussion, evidence-based argumentation, and reflection. The article concludes that literary education should move beyond the reproduction of predetermined interpretations and encourage students to become active, independent, and critically responsible readers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Raxmatullayeva, Y. N. qizi. (2026). CRITICAL READING SKILLS THROUGH MODERN ENGLISH LITERATURE. Konferensiyalar, 1(1), 398-406. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23324131

References

Hà, T. A., Huertas-Abril, C. A. Teaching Critical Reading in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Pedagogical Framework Proposal. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2024, Vol. 53, Article 101599. Relevant sections on critical reading, critical-thinking skills, the two-stage model and empirical results.

Facione, P. A. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 2015, pp. 1–30.

Saadé, R. G., Morin, D., Thomas, J. D. The Relationship between Reading Comprehension and Critical Thinking: A Theoretical Study. Journal of King Saud University – Languages and Translation, 2012, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 35–41.

Lazar, G. Literature and Language Teaching: A Guide for Teachers and Trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 1–21, 22–47, 48– 61, 62–70.

Bobkina, J., Stefanova, S. Literature and Critical Literacy Pedagogy in the EFL Classroom: Towards a Model of Teaching Critical Thinking Skills. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2016, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 677– 696.

Janks, H. Domination, Access, Diversity and Design: A Synthesis for Critical Literacy Education. Educational Review, 2000, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 175– 186.

Paran, A. The Role of Literature in Instructed Foreign Language Learning and Teaching: An Evidence-Based Survey. Language Teaching, 2008, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 465–496.

Hà, T. A., Huertas-Abril, C. A. Teaching Critical Reading in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Pedagogical Framework Proposal. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2024, Vol. 53, Article 101599. Empirical study with 39 undergraduate students and reported percentages of learner responses.

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., Zhang, D. Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 2008, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 1102–1134.

Hall, G. Literature in Language Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 83–122, 160–177, 189–212.

Widdowson, H. G. Stylistics and the Teaching of Literature. London: Longman, 1975, pp. 1–126.

Borsheim-Black, C., Macaluso, M., Petrone, R. Critical Literature Pedagogy: Teaching Canonical Literature for Critical Literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 2014, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 123–133.

Bacon, C. K. Multilanguage, Multipurpose: A Literature Review, Synthesis, and Framework for Critical Literacies in English Language Teaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 2017, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 424–453.

Ervin, J. Critically Reading the Canon: Culturally Sustaining Approaches to a Prescribed Literature Curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 2022, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 321–329.

McKenzie, C. A., Jarvie, S. The Limits of Resistant Reading in Critical Literacy Practices. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 2018, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 298–309.

Kramsch, C. Literary Texts in the Classroom: A Discourse. The Modern Language Journal, 1985, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 356–366.

Collie, J., Slater, S. Literature in the Language Classroom: A Resource Book of Ideas and Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 1– 266.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>